They would also naturally appeal to anyone moving to the web after experience with print design as a fixed-width is a given condition in print.įluid layouts are usually created by setting the body to be 100% of the width of the available window and then have all other measurements expressed in some % of the body width. Horizontal scrollbars may appear at lower resolutionĬontrol and cost are the main reasons fixed-width layouts are so popular.Designed for an average visitor and not ideal for all visitors.Can lead to excessive external whitespace at large resolutions.Doesn’t take advantage of the flexible nature of the web.Doesn’t take advantage of space in browser window.Everything can be pre-designed to pixel perfection.Simplest, quickest and least expensive to develop due to their static nature.More predictable as the layout doesn’t change when the browser is resized.Greater control over the placement and display of elements.The overall width might be based on either internal or external things.įixed-width layouts are probably the most common layouts you see online today. Typically you center the design to split the external whitespace for large resolution browsers. Based on some data about your audience’s resolution you design for an optimum width. The difference is that fluid layouts are measured relative to something external to the design (browser window), while elastic layouts are measured relative to something internal to the design (font-size).įixed-width layouts are static. Pay attention to the difference between fluid/liquid layouts and elastic layouts. They’re a solution to maintaining order inside a dynamic container. Fluid/Elastic Grids - A type of elastic layout that makes use of a grid.They’re a solution to the multiple devices and resolutions of our audience. Responsive - Using different stylesheets based on possible ranges of widths of the audience. They’re a solution to the cons of all 3 layouts above. Hybrid - Using a combination of fixed and either fluid or elastic design elements.They’re a solution to the control issues with fluid designs Elastic - Overall width is set in proportion to some design element, usually font-size (em).They’re a solution to multiple resolutions. Fluid/Liquid - Overall width is set in proportion to the browser window (%).They’re a solution to the lack of control designing for the web. Fixed-Width - Overall width is fixed with absolute measurements (px).You’re likely familiar with all of the css layouts below, but to make sure we’re on the same page, let’s quickly define each. You can click through on any of the images to see the site in question and then resize your browser of font size to see how the layouts react. Note: While you can’t always tell from the screenshots throughout this post I’ve tried to match the screenshot with the layout described below it. What are the pros and cons of some of the common css layouts available to us? Are some layouts preferred over others? It might even be a hybrid layout or be responsive to different devices. Your design could be of fixed-width or it could be fluid or elastic. I'm looking for real text replacement.There are a number of css layout patterns you can use when developing a website. But it turns out thay method actually requires putting an image in the html content. I did find a blog post that discusses this ( ). I understand that any of the common image replacement techniques could be easily combined with media queries to incrementally change the size of the text element to specific height x width ratios that work. But it's not straightforward to get the height of the text element to scale with it's width because the browser doesn't consider the background image as part of the content. And I know that you can set background-size: 100%. Is it possible to use CSS to do a fluid image replacement?Īlmost all image replacement techniques use a background-image. CSS-Tricks has a museum of some techniques ( ).īut none of these allows for replacement with a fluid image (for example, a logo that stretches across 100% of a fluid page layout). Using CSS to replace text with an image is a well known practice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |